Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery (Asia Pacific)

Register      Login

VOLUME 12 , ISSUE 1 ( January-March, 2025 ) > List of Articles

Technique Article

A Novel, Low-cost Distraction Technique for Ankle Arthroscopy: A Technical Note

Rajesh Rachha, Dev A Galagali

Keywords : Ankle arthroscopy, Distraction, Low cost, Noninvasive

Citation Information : Rachha R, Galagali DA. A Novel, Low-cost Distraction Technique for Ankle Arthroscopy: A Technical Note. J Foot Ankle Surg Asia-Pacific 2025; 12 (1):28-30.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10040-1373

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 20-12-2024

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2025; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim and background: The popularity of ankle arthroscopy is increasing in diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. The surgical technique has evolved over time. Distraction is used for better visualization of the entire joint and ease of instrumentation. Multiple invasive and noninvasive methods have been described. However, a cost-effective and simple setup ideal for a developing country is lacking and needs attention. Technique: The setup consists of a metal stand, generally used for administering intravenous drugs (IV stand), a clamp, and an ankle strap. With the limb on the lithotomy stand, the traction is applied. Using this technique, anterior and posterior portals can be made with ease. Conclusion: This is a convenient and cost-effective setup that can be used for distraction during ankle arthroscopy. The setup comprises equipment commonly found in a hospital setting. Outcomes have been satisfactory among our patients. Clinical significance: A low-cost distraction technique is required in developing countries for good outcomes in ankle arthroscopy. Commercially available distraction setups are expensive. The procedure described provides a good technique that can also be used in a peripheral Indian hospital setting.


PDF Share
  1. Masaki Watanabe 1911–1995. Who's Who in Orthopedics. London: Springer. 2005. p. 347. DOI: 10.1007/1-84628-070-2_269
  2. Dhillon MS, Hooda A, Kumar P. History of foot and ankle arthroscopy. J Arthrosc Surg Sport Med 2020;1(1):126–132. DOI: 10.25259/JASSM_4_2020
  3. Connelly J, Ferkel RD. Ankle arthroscopy: correct portals and noninvasive distraction. Arthroscopy 2021;37(4):1066–1067. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.02.023
  4. Kumar VP, Satku K. The A-O femoral distractor for ankle arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 1994;10(1):118–119. DOI: 10.1016/s0749-8063(05)80305-6
  5. Manderson EL, Nwaneri UR, Amin KB. The fracture table as a distraction mode in ankle arthroscopy. Foot Ankle Int 1994;15(8):444–445. DOI: 10.1177/107110079401500808
  6. Washburn FJ, Umbel BD, Martin KD. Use of the external fixator calcaneus pin: using the TRIMANO to its full potential. Arthrosc Tech 2022;11(4):e669–e673. DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2021.12.022
  7. Casteleyn PP, Handelberg F. Distraction for ankle arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 1995;11(5):633–634. DOI: 10.1016/0749-8063(95)90146-9
  8. Nickisch F, Barg A, Saltzman C. Postoperative complications of posterior ankle and hindfoot arthroscopy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012;94:439–446. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00069
  9. Ahn JH, Park D, Park YT, et al. What should we be careful of ankle arthroscopy? J Orthop Surg 2019;27(3). DOI: 10.1177/2309499019862502
  10. Gentile M, Blickenstaff B, Peluso R, et al. One-step distraction technique using Trimano Fortis™ arm in ankle arthroscopy. Foot Ankle Surg: Tech Rep Cases 2022;2(1). DOI: 10.1016/j.fastrc.2021.100111
  11. Unangst A, Martin KD. Simple 1—step ankle arthroscopy distraction. Arthrosc Tech 2015;4(6):e873–e876. DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2015.08.017
  12. Ball L, Hawken R, Davis J. Distraction of the ankle joint during arthroscopy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2009;91(3):266. DOI: 10.1308/003588409X392054a
  13. Yates CK, Grana WA. A simple distraction technique for ankle arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 1988;4(2):103–105. DOI: 10.1016/s0749-8063(88)80075-6
  14. Dowdy PA, Watson BV, Amendola A, et al. Noninvasive ankle distraction: relationship between force, magnitude of distraction, and nerve conduction abnormalities. Arthroscopy 1996;12(1):64–69. DOI: 10.1016/s0749-8063(96)90221-2
  15. Rodríguez-Merchán EC, Encinas-Ullán CA, Ruiz-Pérez JS, et al. Complications of ankle arthroscopy: frequency, prevention, and treatment. EFORT Open Rev 2024;9(1):3–15. DOI: 10.1530/EOR-22-0144
  16. Dalmau-Pastor M, Vega J. Ankle arthroscopy: no-distraction and dorsiflexion allows advanced techniques. Arthroscopy 2019;35(12):3171–3172. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.10.013
  17. Lozano-Calderón SA, Samocha Y, McWilliam J. Comparative performance of ankle arthroscopy with and without traction. Foot Ankle Int 2012;33(9):740–745. DOI: 10.3113/FAI.2012.0740
  18. Salvi AE. Joint distraction is recommended in ankle arthroscopy. Orthopedics 2009;32(5):311. DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20090502-08
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.