Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery (Asia Pacific)

Register      Login

VOLUME 11 , ISSUE 4 ( October-December, 2024 ) > List of Articles

Technique Article

Weight-bearing Dynamic Foot and Ankle Fluoroscopy—A Useful Diagnostic Examination with an Emphasis on the Talotarsal Joint: A Technical Note

Shiv M Ajoy, Michael E Graham, Dev A Galagali

Keywords : Dynamic fluoroscopy, Foot deformity, Pes planus, Talotarsal joint

Citation Information : Ajoy SM, Graham ME, Galagali DA. Weight-bearing Dynamic Foot and Ankle Fluoroscopy—A Useful Diagnostic Examination with an Emphasis on the Talotarsal Joint: A Technical Note. J Foot Ankle Surg Asia-Pacific 2024; 11 (4):195-198.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10040-1355

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 20-09-2024

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2024; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim and background: The foot and ankle form one of the most complex joints of the human body. Clinical examination complemented with the right diagnostics help to make reasonable diagnosis and plan treatment for the same. Weight-bearing radiographs are the norm; however, they are not sufficient to evaluate a dynamic deformity, which is best evaluated by weight-bearing fluoroscopy. Technique: A mini C-arm in a Western setting or a tilting fluoroscopy unit in an Indian setting, with a provision to allow the patient to stand on a step and perform the dynamic single-limb weight-bearing stance, can provide the best diagnostic imaging when dealing with dynamic deformities such as pes planus, and the technique for the same is described here. Conclusion: Dynamic weight-bearing fluoroscopy evaluates the relationships between the various bones of the foot and ankle and helps to plan the treatment for that specific type of pes planus. Clinical significance: A deformity such as pes planus, which has resulted from the malalignment of the talotarsal joint (TTJ), can be easily identified, and appropriate treatment measures can be planned, which would be missed in static imaging of the foot.


PDF Share
  1. Burgess S. Why the ankle-foot complex is a masterpiece of engineering and a rebuttal of “bad design” arguments. BIO-complexity 2022;2022(2):1–10. DOI: 10.5048/bio-c.2022.3
  2. Myerson MS, Thordarson DB, Johnson JE, et al. Classification and nomenclature: progressive collapsing foot deformity. Foot Ankle Int 2020;41(10):1271–1276. DOI: 10.1177/1071100720950722
  3. Schermann H, Ashkani-Esfahani S, Zhao J, et al. Use of a lightweight portable fluoroscopy device for obtaining weightbearing ankle images. J Foot Ankle Surg 2023;62(1):102–106. DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2022.05.006
  4. Li Y, Li W, Sun N, et al. Simulated weightbearing fluoroscopy to assess intraoperative hindfoot alignment. Foot Ankle Int 2023;44(5):469–476. DOI: 10.1177/10711007231159377
  5. Badman BL, Rill L, Butkovich B, et al. Radiation exposure with use of the mini-C-arm for routine orthopaedic imaging procedures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87(1):13–17. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02162
  6. Giordano BD, Ryder S, Baumhauer JF, et al. Exposure to direct and scatter radiation with use of mini-c-arm fluoroscopy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89(5):948–952. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00733
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.