Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery (Asia Pacific)

Register      Login

VOLUME 8 , ISSUE 3 ( July-September, 2021 ) > List of Articles

Current Concepts Review

Bracing in Clubfoot: What is Different in 2021?

Shobhit Gupta, Anil Agarwal

Keywords : Adherence, Clubfoot, Compliance, Foot abduction brace, Ponseti technique, Recurrence, Relapse

Citation Information : Gupta S, Agarwal A. Bracing in Clubfoot: What is Different in 2021?. J Foot Ankle Surg Asia-Pacific 2021; 8 (3):118-125.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10040-1172

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 08-07-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Bracing is an integral and essential part of Ponseti\'s management of clubfoot. The standard foot abduction brace (FAB) maintains the affected foot in 60–70° abduction and 10–15° dorsiflexion while keeping the foot apart at a distance approximately equal to both shoulders’ width. Foot abduction brace is recommended to be worn full time for the initial 3–4 months and subsequently night/nap time till 4–5 years of age. Foot abduction brace prevents relapse by continuous stretching of posteromedial soft tissue of the foot and gradually ensuring their stress relaxation. Several designs of FAB are marketed like Denis Browne splint, Steenbeek brace, Mitchell-Ponseti brace, Dobbs brace, etc. The prolonged use of brace required for maintenance of deformity correction is however marred with issues of non-adherence and recurrence. Furthermore, several genetic, socioeconomic, parental, healthcare-related factors affect the overall functionality of the brace. Bracing in clubfoot is an evolving science. There are efforts to achieve better patient outcomes by eliminating these barriers, better brace designs, and following strategic guidelines.


PDF Share
  1. Ponseti IV, Smoley EN. The classic: congenital club foot: the results of treatment. 1963. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467(5):1133–1145. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-0720-2.
  2. Laaveg SJ, Ponseti IV. Long-term results of treatment of congenital club foot. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1980;62(1):23–31. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-198062010-00004.
  3. Zhao D, Liu J, Zhao L, et al. Relapse of clubfoot after treatment with the Ponseti method and the function of the foot abduction orthosis. Clin Orthop Surg 2014;6(3):245–252. DOI: 10.4055/cios.2014.6.3.245.
  4. Thomas HM, Sangiorgio SN, Ebramzadeh E, et al. Relapse rates in patients with clubfoot treated using the ponseti method increase with time: a systematic review. JBJS Rev 2019;7(5):e6. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.18.00124.
  5. Zionts LE, Dietz FR. Bracing following correction of idiopathic clubfoot using the Ponseti method. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2010;18(8):486–493. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-201008000-00005.
  6. Browne D. Congenital talipes equino-varus. Br Med J 1931;2(3693):696–699. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.2.3693.696.
  7. Browne D. Talipes equino varus. Postgrad Med J 1937;13(144):349–362. DOI: 10.1136/pgmj.13.144.349.
  8. Ponseti IV. Relapsing clubfoot: causes, prevention, and treatment. Iowa Orthop J 2002;22:55–56.
  9. Morcuende JA, Dolan LA, Dietz FR, et al. Radical reduction in the rate of extensive corrective surgery for clubfoot using the Ponseti method. Pediatrics 2004;113(2):376–380. DOI: 10.1542/peds.113.2.376.
  10. Göksan SB, Bilgili F, Eren İ, et al. Factors affecting adherence with foot abduction orthosis following Ponseti method. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2015;49(6):620–626. DOI: 10.3944/AOTT.2015.14.0348.
  11. Goldstein RY, Seehausen DA, Chu A, et al. Predicting the need for surgical intervention in patients with idiopathic clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop 2015;35(4):395–402. DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000282.
  12. Zhao D, Li H, Zhao L, et al. Results of clubfoot management using the Ponseti method: do the details matter? a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014;472(4):1329–1336. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-014-3463-7.
  13. Haft GF, Walker CG, Crawford HA. Early clubfoot recurrence after use of the Ponseti method in a New Zealand population. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89(3):487–493. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00169.
  14. Avilucea FR, Szalay EA, Bosch PP, et al. Effect of cultural factors on outcome of Ponseti treatment of clubfeet in rural America. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009;91(3):530–540. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00580.
  15. Kuzma AL, Talwalkar VR, Muchow RD, et al. Brace yourselves: outcomes of ponseti casting and foot abduction orthosis bracing in idiopathic congenital talipes equinovarus. J Pediatr Orthop 2020;40(1):e25–e29. DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001380.
  16. Markell shoe [internet]. New York: M.J. MARKELL SHOE CO.; [cited 2020 Oct 25] Available from: https://www.markellshoe.com/tarso-childrens-corrective-shoes.html.
  17. MD Orthopaedics [internet]. Iowa: MD Orthopaedics, Inc.; [cited 2020 Oct 25] Available from: https://www.mdorthopaedics.com/ordering-information/.
  18. Steenbeek M, Davic OC. Steenbeek brace for clubfoot [internet]. 2nd ed., [cited 2020 Oct 25], Seattle: Global HELP; 2009 https://global-help.org/products/steenbeek_brace_for_clubfoot/.
  19. Dobbs brace [internet]. Missouri: D-Bar Enterprises LLC, [cited 2020 Oct 25] Available from: https://www.dobbsbrace.com/products.
  20. Kessler JI. A new flexible brace used in the Ponseti treatment of talipes equinovarus. J Pediatr Orthop B 2008;17(5):247–250. DOI: 10.1097/BPB.0b013e32830cc3e5.
  21. Abdi R, Hajzargarbashi R, Baghdadi T, et al. Effect of a modified dynamic accordion hinge Denis Browne brace on the success rate of the Ponseti method in idiopathic clubfoot: a preliminary study. J Pediatr Orthop B 2017;26(2):112–115. DOI: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000357.
  22. Savonen B, Gershenson J, Bow JK, et al. Open-source three-dimensional printable infant clubfoot brace. J Prosthet Orthot 2020;32(2):49–58. DOI: 10.1097/JPO.0000000000000257.
  23. Janicki JA, Wright JG, Weir S, et al. A comparison of ankle foot orthoses with foot abduction orthoses to prevent recurrence following correction of idiopathic clubfoot by the Ponseti method. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011;93(5):700–704. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B5.24883.
  24. Solanki PV, Sheth BA, Poduval M, et al. Effectiveness of modified ankle foot orthosis of low-temperature thermoplastics in idiopathic congenital talipes equino varus. J Pediatr Orthop B 2010;19(4):353–360. DOI: 10.1097/BPB.0b013e3283387d16.
  25. Manousaki E, Czuba T, Hägglund G, et al. Evaluation of gait, relapse and compliance in clubfoot treatment with custom-made orthoses. Gait Posture 2016;50:8–13. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.08.005.
  26. Sætersdal C, Fevang JM, Engesæter LB. Inferior results with unilateral compared with bilateral brace in Ponseti-treated clubfeet. J Child Orthop 2017;11(3):216–222. DOI: 10.1302/1863-2548.11.160279.
  27. George HL, Unnikrishnan PN, Garg NK, et al. Unilateral foot abduction orthosis: is it a substitute for Denis Browne boots following Ponseti technique? J Pediatr Orthop B 2011;20(1):22–25. DOI: 10.1097/BPB.0b013e32833fb8a5.
  28. Berger N, Lewens D, Salzmann M, et al. Is unilateral lower leg orthosis with a circular foot unit in the treatment of idiopathic clubfeet a reasonable bracing alternative in the Ponseti method? Five-year results of a supraregional paediatric-orthopaedic centre. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2018;19(1):229. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-018-2160-1.
  29. Chen W, Pu F, Yang Y, et al. Correcting congenital talipes equinovarus in children using three different corrective methods: a consort study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015;94(28):e1004. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001004.
  30. McCartney S, Turner S, Davies K, et al. A new unilateral abduction orthosis for Ponseti-treated clubfoot: a cohort study to assess compliance. Prosthet Orthot Int 2019;43(3):325–330. DOI: 10.1177/0309364618814866.
  31. Dobbs MB, Frick SL, Mosca VS, et al. Design and descriptive data of the randomized clubfoot foot abduction brace length of treatment study (FAB24). J Pediatr Orthop B 2017;26(2):101–107. DOI: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000387.
  32. Dimeo AJ Sr, Lalush DS, Grant E, et al. Development of a surrogate biomodel for the investigation of clubfoot bracing. J Pediatr Orthop 2012;32(7):e47–e52. DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3182571656.
  33. Richards BS, Faulks S, Felton K, et al. Objective measurement of brace wear in successfully Ponseti-treated clubfeet: pattern of decreasing use in the first 2 years. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2020;28(9):383–387. DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00163.
  34. Sangiorgio SN, Ho NC, Morgan RD, et al. The objective measurement of brace-use adherence in the treatment of idiopathic clubfoot. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2016;98(19):1598–1605. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00170.
  35. Alves C. Bracing in clubfoot: do we know enough? J Child Orthop 2019;13(3):258–264. DOI: 10.1302/1863-2548.13.190069.
  36. Bor N, Coplan JA, Herzenberg JE. Ponseti treatment for idiopathic clubfoot: minimum 5-year follow up. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467(5):1263–1270. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0683-8.
  37. Mohamaddan S, Rasit AH, Dawal SZM. Design of mechanical bracing device for clubfoot treatment. J Telecom Electro Comp Enginee 2018;10:91–95.
  38. Nogueira MP, Fox M, Miller K, et al. The Ponseti method of treatment for clubfoot in Brazil: barriers to bracing compliance. Iowa Orthop J 2013;33:161–166.
  39. Agarwal A, Agrawal N, Dubey A, et al. Is the same brace fit for all? The length of abduction bar in Steenbeek foot abduction brace for Indian children-a pilot study. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2019;10(1):209–212. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2017.10.014.
  40. Agarwal A, Gupta S. Letter to the editor. Brace compliance in clubfoot: clinical signs. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020;11:344–346.
  41. Morgenstein A, Davis R, Talwalkar V, et al. A randomized clinical trial comparing reported and measured wear rates in clubfoot bracing using a novel pressure sensor. J Pediatr Orthop 2015;35(2):185–191. DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000205.
  42. Department of Science & Technology [internet]. New Delhi: Government of India; [updated 2019 Dec 11; cited 2020 Oct 25]. Available from: https://dst.gov.in/brace-assist-children-clubfoot-promises-freedom-disability.
  43. Agarwal A, Kumar A, Shaharyar A, et al. The dynamicity of Steenbeek foot abduction brace for clubfoot in dorsiflexion and pronation: a pilot study. Foot Ankle Spec 2016;9(5):394–399. DOI: 10.1177/1938640016640894.
  44. Agarwal A, Kumar A, Mishra M. The foot abduction characteristics following Steenbeek foot abduction brace. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2017;25(1):2309499016684085 10.1177/2309499016684085.
  45. Hemo Y, Gigi R, Wientroub S. Delayed ossification and abnormal development of tarsal bones in idiopathic clubfoot: should it affect bracing protocol when using the Ponseti method? J Child Orthop 2019;13(3):265–270. DOI: 10.1302/1863-2548.13.190080.
  46. Shabtai L, Segev E, Yavor A, et al. Prolonged use of foot abduction brace reduces the rate of surgery in Ponseti-treated idiopathic club feet. J Child Orthop 2015;9(3):177–182. DOI: 10.1007/s11832-015-0663-y.
  47. Sheta RA, El-Sayed M. Is the Denis Browne splint a myth? A long-term prospective cohort study in clubfoot management using Denis Browne splint versus daily exercise protocol. J Foot Ankle Surg 2020;59(2):314–322. DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2019.08.026.
  48. Gintautienė J, Čekanauskas E, Barauskas V, et al. Comparison of the Ponseti method versus early tibialis anterior tendon transfer for idiopathic clubfoot: a prospective randomized study. Medicina (Kaunas) 2016;52(3):163–170. DOI: 10.1016/j.medici.2016.04.004.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.