Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery (Asia Pacific)

Register      Login

VOLUME 8 , ISSUE 4 ( October-December, 2021 ) > List of Articles

Symposium: Complex Injuries Around The Ankle

Syndesmotic Screw: Where does It Break?

Diederick Penning, Merel FN Birnie, Fay RK Sanders, Kristian J de Ruiter, Tim Schepers

Keywords : Ankle, Implant removal, Syndesmosis, Syndesmotic screw

Citation Information : Penning D, Birnie MF, Sanders FR, de Ruiter KJ, Schepers T. Syndesmotic Screw: Where does It Break?. J Foot Ankle Surg Asia-Pacific 2021; 8 (4):168-171.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10040-1184

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 20-10-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2021; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim and objective: There is an increasing body of evidence that syndesmotic screws following stabilization of acute syndesmotic disruption in ankle fractures can be retained if not symptomatic. Some broken screws may remain symptomatic (pain, cortical erosion) and can be difficult to remove. This study aimed to evaluate at what level the syndesmotic screw breaks and how often this occurs at a level that may lead to potential refractory complaints needing further surgical intervention. Materials and methods: All consecutive cases with a surgically treated ankle fracture and subsequent placement of one or more syndesmotic screws were included. The level of syndesmotic screw breakage was divided into six potential different patterns. Intraosseous breakage was considered as a location with possible refractory complaints. The need for subsequent removal of the complete broken syndesmotic screw was recorded. Results: A total of 51 broken syndesmotic screws remained for analysis. The largest amount of screws (22 screws, 43.1%) broke at the level of the lateral tibial cortex. One of the screws broke in-between the fibula and tibia. The need for complete removal of a broken screw (including the medial part) was seen in six screws (11.8% of all broken screws). Conclusion: Albeit broken syndesmotic screws are encountered frequently, the number of locations with possible clinical consequences was low. The need for the complete removal of a broken screw was low. Clinical significance: Retaining the syndesmotic screw should be the new gold standard.


PDF Share
  1. DIngemans SA, Rammelt S, White TO, et al. Should syndesmotic screws be removed after surgical fixation of unstable ankle fractures? A systematic review. Bone Joint J 2016;98-B(11):1497–1504. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B11.BJJ-2016-0202.R1.
  2. Kohring JM, Greenstein A, Gorczyca JT, et al. Immediate improvement in physical function after symptomatic syndesmotic screw removal. J Orthop Trauma 2020;34(6):327–331. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001766.
  3. Walley KC, Hofmann KJ, Velasco BT, et al. Removal of hardware after syndesmotic screw fixation: a systematic literature review. Foot and Ankle Specialist 2017;10(3):252–257. DOI: 10.1177/1938640016685153.
  4. Schepers T. To retain or remove the syndesmotic screw: a review of literature. Archiv Orthop Trauma Surg 2011;131(7):879–883. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-010-1225-x.
  5. Kaye RA. Stabilization of ankle syndesmosis injuries with a syndesmosis screw. Foot Ankle 1989;9(6):290–293. DOI: 10.1177/107110078900900606.
  6. Heim D, Heim U, Regazzoni P. Malleolar fractures with ankle joint instability-positioning screw experiences. Unfallchirurgie 1993;19(5):307–312. DOI: 10.1007/BF02588127.
  7. Boyle MJ, Gao R, Frampton CMA, et al. Removal of the syndesmotic screw after the surgical treatment of a fracture of the ankle in adult patients does not affect one-year outcomes: a randomised controlled trial. Bone Jt J 2014;96-B(12):1699–1705. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B12.34258.
  8. Stuart K, Panchbhavi VK. The fate of syndesmotic screws. Foot Ankle Int 2011;32(5):S519–S525. DOI: 10.3113/FAI.2011.0519.
  9. Gennis E, Koenig S, Rodericks D, et al. The fate of the fixed syndesmosis over time. Foot Ankle Int 2015;36(10):1202–1208. DOI: 10.1177/1071100715588186.
  10. Hamid N, Loeffler BJ, Braddy W, et al. Outcome after fixation of ankle fractures with an injury to the syndesmosis: the effect of the syndesmosis screw. J Bone Jt Surg - Ser B 2009;91(8):1069–1073. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B8.22430.
  11. Ibrahim IO, Velasco BT, Ye MY, et al. Syndesmotic screw breakage may be more problematic than previously reported: increased rates of hardware removal secondary to pain with intraosseous screw breakage. Foot Ankle Spec 2020. DOI: 10.1177/1938640020932049.
  12. Behery OA, Mandel J, Solasz SJ, et al. Patterns and implications of early syndesmotic screw failure in rotational ankle fractures. Foot Ankle Int 2020;41(9):1065–1072. DOI: 10.1177/1071100720935119.
  13. Melvin JS, Downing KL, Ogilvie CM. A technique for removal of broken cannulated tricortical syndesmotic screws. J Orthop Trauma 2008;22(9):648–651. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181886f74.
  14. Riedel MD, Briceno J, Miller CP, et al. Technical tip: removal of a broken tri-cortical syndesmotic screw using a “perfect circle” technique. Injury 2018;49(4):877–880. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.02.022.
  15. Henley MB, Law MD, Henry SL. Removal of broken syndesmotic screws: a technical tip. Orthopedics 1994;17(7):641. DOI: 10.3928/0147-7447-19940701-17.
  16. Sanders FRK, Birnie MFN, Penning D, et al. Surgical site infections following routine syndesmotic screw removal; a systematic review. J Orthop Trauma 2020;35(4):e116–e125. DOI: 10.1097/bot.0000000000001954.
  17. Needleman RL, Skrade DA, Stiehl JB. Effect of the syndesmotic screw on ankle motion. Foot Ankle Int 1989;10(1):17–24. DOI: 10.1177/107110078901000104.
  18. Peter RE, Harrington RM, Henley MB, et al. Biomechanical effects of internal fixation of the distal tibiofibular syndesmotic joint: comparison of two fixation techniques. J Orthop Trauma 1994;8(3):215–219. DOI: 10.1097/00005131-199406000-00006.
  19. Markolf KL, Jackson SR, McAllister DR. Syndesmosis fixation using dual 3.5 mm and 4.5 mm screws with tricortical and quadricortical purchase: a biomechanical study. Foot Ankle Int 2013;34(5):734–739. DOI: 10.1177/1071100713478923.
  20. Hansen M, Le L, Wertheimer S, et al. Syndesmosis fixation: Analysis of shear stress via axial load on 3.5-mm and 4.5-mm quadricortical syndesmotic screws. J Foot Ankle Surg 2006;45(2):65–69. DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2005.12.004.
  21. Song DJ, Lanzi JT, Groth AT, et al. The effect of syndesmosis screw removal on the reduction of the distal tibiofibular joint: a prospective radiographic study. Foot Ankle Int 2014;35(6):543–548. DOI: 10.1177/1071100714524552.
  22. Baek JH, Kim TY, Kwon YB, et al. Radiographic change of the distal tibiofibular joint following removal of transfixing screw fixation. Foot Ankle Int 2018;39(3):318–325. DOI: 10.1177/1071100717745526.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.