Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery (Asia Pacific)

Register      Login

VOLUME 6 , ISSUE 1 ( January-June, 2019 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Attendee Profile of a Clubfoot Patient: Experiences from an Indian Ponseti Clubfoot Clinic

Vimal Kumar KH, Anil Agarwal, Obanglemla Imsong

Keywords : Attendee, Clubfoot, CTEV

Citation Information : KH VK, Agarwal A, Imsong O. Attendee Profile of a Clubfoot Patient: Experiences from an Indian Ponseti Clubfoot Clinic. J Foot Ankle Surg Asia-Pacific 2019; 6 (1):7-9.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10040-1098

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-06-2019

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Introduction: The attendee (relatives) profile of clubfoot child for initiating treatment is probably a gross measure of family responsibility and social awareness regarding the disease in Indian circumstances. We conducted a prospective pilot study with primary research question “Who brings the clubfeet patient to the clubfeet clinic?” Further, the patients were followed up to 7 visits to see any gross changes in the attendee trend. The involvement of second-degree relatives was also closely monitored. Materials and methods: The CURE counselors recorded the relatives accompanying the newly enrolled clubfoot patients (July–December 2017). Patients already in follow-up, with irregular follow-up, lost to follow-up, and not willing to participate in the study were excluded. For the purpose of statistical analysis, the total opportunities to accompany patient (100 patients × 7 visits = 700 occasions) were taken as the base measurement. Results: Out of 100 studied patients, only 39 children sought treatment within 6 weeks. Mother accompanied the child most (88.5%) followed by father (71.7%) (p < 0.000001). Both parents accompanied the child on 62.4% occasions. The second-degree relatives accompanied the child on 32.7% occasions (p < 0.000001). The most persistent attendee over 7 weeks was child\'s mother, followed by father and next by parents together. The second-degrees relatives were least persistent of all. Conclusion: Our study showed a high percentage of parental participation and its persistence during the casting phase of Ponseti method in Indian clubfoot children. There seems to be a lot of scope for further community education and awareness in view of the relatively older child being brought for treatment and lesser involvement of second-degree relatives.


PDF Share
  1. Gadhok K, Belthur MV, et al. Qualitative assessment of the challenges to the treatment of idiopathic clubfoot by the Ponseti method in urban India. Iowa Orthop J 2012;32:135–140.
  2. Botchway H, Belinda A, et al. Parents/caregivers perception about the management of clubfoot: the case of St. John of God Hospital. Intl Jrnl of Innovative Research in Edu Tech and Social Strategies 2016;2:85–94.
  3. Kazibwe H, Struthers P. Barriers experienced by parents of children with clubfoot deformity attending specialised clinics in Uganda. Trop Doct 2009;39:15–18. DOI: 10.1258/td.2008.080178.
  4. Lu N, Zhao L, et al. From cutting to casting: impact and initial barriers to the Ponseti method of clubfoot treatment in China. Iowa Orthop J 2010;30:1–6.
  5. History of CURE-Club Foot India (2016), http://clubfootindia.in/about-us/, (assessed September 24, 2017).
  6. Sharma P, Verma R, et al. Analysis of the effectiveness of a non-governmental organization in supporting clubfoot clinic at a tertiary care center. SICOT J 2015;1:8. DOI: 10.1051/sicotj/2015008.
  7. Wynne-Davies R. Family studies and the cause of congenital club foot talipes equinovarus, talipes calcaneo-valgus and metatarsus varus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1964;46:445–463. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.46B3.445.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.