Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery (Asia Pacific)

Register      Login

VOLUME 6 , ISSUE 1 ( January-June, 2019 ) > List of Articles

EDITORIAL

The AOFAS Clinical Rating Systems—Time to Bid Adieu?

Siddhartha Sharma

Citation Information : Sharma S. The AOFAS Clinical Rating Systems—Time to Bid Adieu?. J Foot Ankle Surg Asia-Pacific 2019; 6 (1):1-1.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10040-1103

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-06-2019

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract


PDF Share
  1. Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, et al. Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int 1994 Jul;15(7):349–353. DOI: 10.1177/107110079401500701.
  2. Pinsker E, Daniels TR. AOFAS position statement regarding the future of the AOFAS Clinical Rating Systems. Foot Ankle Int 2011 Sep;32(9):841–842. DOI: 10.3113/FAI.2011.0841.
  3. Guyton GP. Theoretical limitations of the AOFAS scoring systems: an analysis using Monte Carlo modeling. Foot Ankle Int 2001 Oct;22(10):779–787. DOI: 10.1177/107110070102201003.
  4. SooHoo NF, Shuler M, et al. American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society. Evaluation of the validity of the AOFAS Clinical Rating Systems by correlation to the SF-36. Foot Ankle Int 2003 Jan;24(1): 50–55. DOI: 10.1177/107110070302400108.
  5. Kitaoka HB, Meeker JE, et al. AOFAS Position Statement Regarding Patient-reported Outcome Measures. Foot Ankle Int 2018 Dec;39(12):1389–1393. DOI: 10.1177/1071100718809066.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.