Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery (Asia Pacific)

Register      Login

VOLUME 5 , ISSUE 1 ( June, 2018 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Determination of Types of Foot in the Indian Population and Its Association with Ingrowing Toenail

Dhananjaya Sharma, Pawan Agarwal, Mahendra Singh

Keywords : Egyptian, Foot shape, Greek, Ingrown toenail

Citation Information : Sharma D, Agarwal P, Singh M. Determination of Types of Foot in the Indian Population and Its Association with Ingrowing Toenail. J Foot Ankle Surg Asia-Pacific 2018; 5 (1):13-15.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10040-1082

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-03-2017

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2018; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: Ingrown toenail (onychocryptosis) is a common condition affecting great toenail. Several risk factors including foot shape, particularly, Egyptian foot, has been implicated in the pathogenesis. The purpose of this study is to determine the types of foot in normal Indian population and its relationship with incidence of ingrowing toenail. Materials and methods: A total of 197 healthy adults were included in the study and their foot type was determined by direct observation and classified into one of the three foot types. Consecutive 25 patients (25 feet) undergoing treatment for ingrowing toenails were selected. Each foot was classified into one of the three foot types and analyzed. Observations: Out of 197 adults, 77 had Egyptian foot, 47 had square foot, and 73 had Greek foot. In the male population, Greek foot (44.0%) was most prevalent and this was statistically significant (p = 0.023). In female subjects, Egyptian foot was the most common and seen in 44.3% (p = 0.1763). In ingrowing toenail group, out of 25 adults 11 had Egyptian foot, 7 had square foot, and 7 had Greek foot. Conclusion: In the Indian population, the most common foot type is Egyptian foot (39.08%), followed by Greek foot (37.05%) and square foot (23.85%). Though ingrowing toenail is thought to be the more common in Egyptian foot, it is not proved to be a risk factor in this study.


PDF Share
  1. Kose O, Celiktas M, Kisin B, Ozyurek S, Yigit S. Is there a relationship between forefoot alignment and ingrown toenail? A case-control study. Foot Ankle Spec 2011 Feb;4(1):14-17.
  2. Ogawa R, Hyakusoku H. Does Egyptian foot present an increased risk of ingrown toenail? Plast Reconstr Surg 2006 May;117(6):2111-2112.
  3. Venkatachalam S. Ingrowing great toenail following metatarsophalangeal joint fusion for hallux valgus: a case report and proposed mechanism of aetiology. J Foot Ankle Surg 2001 Jun;7(2):113-115.
  4. Ganapathy A, Sadeesh T, Rao S. Morphometric analysis of foot in young adult individuals. World J Pharm Pharma Sci 2015 Jul;4(8):980-993.
  5. Langford DT, Burke C, Robertson K. Risk factors in onychocryptosis. Br J Surg 1989 Jan;76(1):45-48.
  6. Li J, Chen J, Hong G, Chen Z, Weng Y, Wang F. Clinical study of treatment for recalcitrant ingrown toenail by partial distal phalanx removal. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009 Oct;62(10):1327-1330.
  7. Parrinello JF, Japour CJ, Dykyj D. Incurvated nail: does the phalanx determine nail plate shape? J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1995 Nov;85(11):696-698.
  8. Darwish FM, Haddad W, Ammari F, Aoudat Z. Association of abnormal footangles and onychocryptosis. Foot (Edinb) 2008 Dec;18(4):198-201.
  9. Pearson HJ, Bury RN, Wapples J, Watkin DF. Ingrowing toenails: is there a nail abnormality? A prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1987 Nov;69(5):840-842.
  10. Manna I, Pradhan D, Ghosh S, Kar SK, Dhara P. A comparative study of foot dimension between adult male and female and evaluation of foot hazards due to using of footwear. J Physiol Anthropol Appl Human Sci 2001 Jul;20(4):241-246.
  11. Viladot A. Metatarsalgia due to biomechanical alterations of the forefoot. Orthop Clin North Am 1973 Jan;4(1):165-178.
  12. Günal I, Koþay C, Veziroðlu A, Balkan Y, Ilhan F. Relationship between onychocryptosis and foot type and treatment with toe spacer: a preliminary investigation. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2003 Jan-Feb;93(1):33-36.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.