Listract Test: A Standardized Assessment Method for Isolated Lisfranc Instability in Cadaver Models
Vasundhara Mathur, David Osei-Hwedieh, Sayyed Hadi Sayyed Hosseinian, Fernando Raduan, Philip B Kaiser, Gregory R Waryasz, Lorena Bejarano-Pineda, John Y Kwon, Hamid Ghaednia, Soheil Ashkani-Esfahani
Aim and background: Ligamentous Lisfranc injuries are challenging to detect, with 20–40% of them remaining undiagnosed or misdiagnosed at initial presentation. While direct visualization in the operation room is the gold standard for detecting Lisfranc instability, it is also the most invasive. Other techniques currently available for assessment are unstandardized and nonreproducible. We aimed to introduce a novel reproducible intraoperative mechanical testing method (Listract test) for isolated Lisfranc instability assessment.
Technique: The Lisfranc ligament between the first cuneiform (C1) and second metatarsus (M2) in eight lower leg cadaveric specimens was dissected to replicate C1-M2 Lisfranc instability. Intraoperative radiographs were used for measuring C1-M2 diastasis and area in two states, “stable” and “unstable.” A 50N distraction force was applied in the direction of the C1-M2 ligament through two K-wires for “unstable” conditions. Three methods of fixation—flexible fixation, metal screw, and bio-integrative screw were alternatively used to stabilize the joint, and the Listract test was applied again in a “stable” condition. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for the Listract test was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). The sensitivity and specificity of the Listract test for detection of ruptured ligament instability using C1-M2 diastasis (cutoff taken as 3 mm) were 100 and 77.8%. Similarly, the instability of ruptured ligament measured using C1-M2 area (cutoff taken as 26.1 mm) was 85 and 100%. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for C1-M2 diastasis and area measurements was 0.84 and 0.92, respectively.
Conclusion and clinical significance: The Listract test is a simple, standardizable, and replicable intraoperative method for evaluating the Lisfranc joint for instability. Developing a device with this mechanism can be clinically significant to accurately assess the severity of instability intraoperatively and provide appropriate treatment.
English TA. Dislocations of the metatarsal bone and adjacent toe. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1964;46:700–704. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.46B4.700
Alberta FG, Aronow MS, Barrero M, et al. Ligamentous Lisfranc joint injuries: a biomechanical comparison of dorsal plate and transarticular screw fixation. Foot Ankle Int 2005;26(6):462–473. DOI: 10.1177/107110070502600607
Renninger CH, Cochran G, Tompane T, et al. Injury characteristics of low-energy Lisfranc injuries compared with high-energy injuries. Foot Ankle Int 2017;38(9):964–969. DOI: 10.1177/1071100717709575
Philbin T, Rosenberg G, Sferra JJ. Complications of missed or untreated Lisfranc injuries. Foot Ankle Clin 2003;8(1):61–71. DOI: 10.1016/s1083-7515(03)00003-2
Cassebaum WH. Lisfranc fracture-dislocations. Clin Orthop Relate Res 1963;30:116–129.
Desmond EA, Chou LB. Current concepts review: Lisfranc injuries. Foot Ankle Int 2006;27(8):653–660. DOI: 10.1177/107110070602700819
Moracia-Ochagavía I, Rodríguez-Merchán EC. Lisfranc fracture-dislocations: current management. EFORT Open Rev 2019;4(7):430–444. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180076
Raikin SM, Elias I, Dheer S, et al. Prediction of midfoot instability in the subtle Lisfranc injury. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging with intraoperative findings. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009;91(4):892–899. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01075
Kitsukawa K, Hirano T, Niki H, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of MRI to evaluate acute Lisfranc joint injuries: comparison with direct operative observations. Foot Ankle Orthop 2022;7(1):24730114211069080. DOI: 10.1177/24730114211069080
Bhimani R, Sornsakrin P, Ashkani-Esfahani S, et al. Using area and volume measurement via weightbearing CT to detect Lisfranc instability. J Orthop Res 2021;39(11):2497–2505. DOI: 10.1002/jor.24970
Naguib S, Meyr AJ. Reliability, surgeon preferences, and eye-tracking assessment of the stress examination of the tarsometatarsal (Lisfranc) joint complex. J Foot Ankle Surg 2019;58(1):93–96. DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2018.08.015
Young K, Lee H. Freer test for an intraoperative evaluation of a Lisfranc joint injury: a technical report. J Korean Foot Ankle Soc 2020;24(4):165–167. DOI: 10.14193/jkfas.2020.24.4.165
Mascio A, Greco T, Maccauro G, et al. Lisfranc complex injuries management and treatment: current knowledge. Int J Physiol Pathophysiol Pharmacol 2022;14(3):161–170.
Sripanich Y, Weinberg MW, Krähenbühl N, et al. Imaging in Lisfranc injury: a systematic literature review. Skeletal Radiol 2020;49(1):31–53. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-019-03282-1
Rikken QGH, Hagemeijer NC, De Bruijn J, et al. Novel values in the radiographic diagnosis of ligamentous Lisfranc injuries. Injury 2022;53(6):2326–2332. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.02.044
Shrout PE. Measurement reliability and agreement in psychiatry. Stat Methods Med Res 1998;7(3):301–317. DOI: 10.1191/096228098672090967
Macmahon PJ, Dheer S, Raikin SM, et al. MRI of injuries to the first interosseous cuneometatarsal (Lisfranc) ligament. Skeletal Radiol 2009;38(3):255–260. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-008-0613-6
Potter HG, Deland JT, Gusmer PB, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the Lisfranc ligament of the foot. Foot Ankle Int 1998;19(7):438–446. DOI: 10.1177/107110079801900704
Lu J, Ebraheim NA, Skie M, et al. Radiographic and computed tomographic evaluation of Lisfranc dislocation: a cadaver study. Foot Ankle Int 1997;18(6):351–355. DOI: 10.1177/107110079701800608