Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery (Asia Pacific)

Register      Login

VOLUME 11 , ISSUE 1 ( January-March, 2024 ) > List of Articles

CASE SERIES

A Two-step Protocol for Managing the Severe Consequences of Septic Arthritis in the Ankle

Chandan Narang, Girish Motwani, Rehan Ahmed

Keywords : Case report, Osteotomy, Pantalar arthrodesis, Radical debridement, Septic ankle arthritis, Tibiotalocalcaneal nail

Citation Information : Narang C, Motwani G, Ahmed R. A Two-step Protocol for Managing the Severe Consequences of Septic Arthritis in the Ankle. J Foot Ankle Surg Asia-Pacific 2024; 11 (1):13-24.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10040-1299

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 30-12-2023

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2024; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to report a novel two-step technique for managing the severe consequences of septic ankle arthritis. Background: Septic ankle arthritis is a challenging orthopedic disease with a high risk of morbidity and mortality. Early treatment is essential to avoid irreparable articular cartilage damage and erosion, osteomyelitis, and dysfunctional painful foot and ankle deformities. Therefore, an aggressive surgical approach is essential to prevent severe extremity-threatening arthritis. Case description: We report that three of the cases of challenging septic ankle and ankle arthritis were treated with a two-phase protocol. The first stage included radical debridement, microbiological evaluation, insertion of vancomycin-coated biogranules, and administration of empirical intravenous antibiotics. In the second stage, deformity correction was performed by osteotomy and fixation. All three were asymptomatic at 6 months follow-up, had no discomfort in daily life and were able to perform fully functional activities. Conclusion: Two-stage protocol is a reliable way to manage septic arthritis of the ankle, with significant bone loss in the talar region and related deformities. It provides a good functional outcome of the limb with rigidness. It gives rigid, stable fixation using tibiotalocalcaneal nails.


HTML PDF Share
  1. Adams JC. Arthrodesis of the ankle joint; experiences with the transfibular approach. J Bone Joint Surg 1948;30B(3):506–511.
  2. Boer R, Mader K, Penning D, et al. Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis using a reamed retrograde locking nail. Clinorthop 2007;463:151–156. DOI: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e31814fb1bb
  3. Cierny G 3rd, Cook WG, Mader JT. Ankle arthrodesis in the presence of ongoing sepsis. Indications, methods, and results. Orthop Clin North Am 1989;20(4):709–721.
  4. Cameron SE, Ullrich P. Arthroscopic arthrodesis of the ankle joint. Arthroscopy 2000;16(1):21–26. DOI: 10.1016/s0749-8063(00)90123-3
  5. Esterhai JL Jr, Gelb I. Adult septic arthritis. Orthop Clin North Am 1991;22(3):503–514. DOI: 10.1016/S0030-5898(20)31678-3
  6. Hogan A, Heppert VG, Suda AJ. Osteomyelitis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2013;133(9):1183–1196. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-013-1785-7
  7. Johnson EE, Weltmer J, Lian GJ, et al. Ilizarov ankle arthrodesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992;280:160–169.
  8. Kang SN, Sanghera T, Mangwani J, et al. The management of septic arthritis in children: systematic review of the English language literature. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009;91(9):1127–1133. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B9.22530
  9. Kazemi K, Arab AM, Abdollahi I, et al. Electromiography comparison of distal and proximal lower limb muscle activity patterns during external perturbation in subjects with and without functional ankle instability. Hum Mov Sci 2017;55:211–220. DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2017.08.013
  10. Klouche S, El-Masri F, Graff W, et al. Arthrodesis with internal fixation of the infected ankle. J Foot Ankle Surg 2011;50(1):25–30. DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2010.10.011
  11. Kollig E, Esenwein SA, Muhr G, et al. Fusion of the septic ankle: experience with 15 cases using hybrid external fixation. J Trauma 2003;55(4):685–691. DOI: 10.1097/01.TA.0000051933.83342.E4
  12. Love C, Palestro CJ. Nuclear medicine imaging of bone infections. Clin Radiol 2016;71(7):632–646. DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2016.01.003
  13. Mann RA, Rongstad KM. Arthrodesis of the ankle: a critical analysis. Foot Ankle Int 1998;19(1):3–9. DOI: 10.1177/107110079801900102
  14. Mann RA, Van Manen JW, Wapner K, et al. Ankle fusion. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991;268:49–55.
  15. Mathews CJ, Weston VC, Jones A, et al. Bacterial septic arthritis in adults. Lancet 2010;375(9717):846–855. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61595-6
  16. Motley TA, Carpenter BB. Pantalar arthrodesis Chapter 61—McGlamry's comprehensive Textbook of Foot and ankle surgery. 4th edn. Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2012;1. p. 855.
  17. Movassaghi K, Wakefield C, Bohl DD, et al. Septic arthritis of the native ankle. JBJS Rev 2019;7(3):e6. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.18.00080
  18. Newman JH. Review of septic arthritis throughout the antibiotic era. Ann Rheum Dis 1976;35(3):198–205. DOI: 10.1136/ard.35.3.198
  19. Persaud SJ, Zdenek C, Catanzariti AR. Staged surgical intervention in the treatment of septic ankle arthritis with autologous circular pillar fibula augmentation: a case report. Foot Ankle Online J 2017;10(3):28–33. DOI: 10.3827/faoj.2017.1003.0006
  20. Richter D, Hahn MP, Laun RA, et al. Arthrodesis of the infected ankle and subtalar joint: technique, indications, and results of 45 consecutive cases. J Trauma 1999;47(6):1072–1078. DOI: 10.1097/00005373-199912000-00013
  21. Simoni G, Maccauro G, Fenga D, et al. Arthrodesis of the ankle joint in septic osteoarthritis: six years long term outcomes in authors’ personal experience. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2019;23(2 Suppl):139–144. DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_201904_17483
  22. Stone JW. Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Clin 2006;11(2):361–368. DOI: 10.1016/j.fcl.2006.03.007
  23. Suda AJ, Richter A, Abou-Nouar G, et al. Arthrodesis for septic arthritis of the ankle: risk factors and complications. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2016;136(10):1343–1348. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-016-2520-y
  24. Thordarson DB, Patzakis MJ, Holtom P, et al. Salvage of the septic ankle with concomitant tibial osteomyelitis. Foot Ankle Int 1997;18(3):151–156. DOI: 10.1177/107110079701800307
  25. Vispo Seara JL, Barthel T, Schmitz H, et al. Arthroscopic treatment of septic joints: prognostic factors. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2002;122(4):204–211. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-001-0386-z
  26. Wang L, Gui J, Gao F, et al. Modified posterior portals for hindfoot arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 2007;23(10):1116–1123. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.04.015
  27. Weston V, Coakley G. British Society for Rheumatology (BSR) Standards, Guidelines and Audit Working Group. Guideline for the management of the hot swollen joint in adults with a particular focus on septic arthritis. J Antimicrob Chemother 2006;58(3):492–493. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkl295
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.