Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery (Asia Pacific)

Register      Login

VOLUME 10 , ISSUE 1 ( January-March, 2023 ) > List of Articles


The Incidence of and Demographic Disparities Among Fifth Metatarsal Fracture Nonunions

Keywords : Fifth metatarsal, Metatarsal fracture, Nonunion

Citation Information : The Incidence of and Demographic Disparities Among Fifth Metatarsal Fracture Nonunions. J Foot Ankle Surg Asia-Pacific 2023; 10 (1):204-208.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10040-1275

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 31-12-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2023; The Author(s).


Aim: This study aimed to assess the incidence and demographics of fifth metatarsal (5MT) fractures, as well as the association of these factors with nonunion rates. Materials and methods: A total of 1,000 adult patients with confirmed 5MT fractures were recruited retrospectively. Patients were screened for union vs nonunion, where nonunion was defined as failure to heal completely within 180 days of fracture diagnosis. Inclusion criteria were: (1) age of ≥ 18-year-old and (2) confirmation of 5MT fracture by experts based on examination and radiograph. Exclusion criteria were: (1) missing data on final healing status, (2) presence of another traumatic injury to the foot during the healing process of the primary 5MT fracture, (3) lack of radiologic proof of healing or nonhealing, and (4) missing demographic data or relevant clinical or operative notes. Data on demographics, fracture characteristics, and treatment methods (conservative vs operative) were also collected. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Chi-square analysis was used, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The overall nonunion rate was 22.4%, with zone 2 demonstrating the highest nonunion rate (28.1%). Weight and body mass index (BMI) were correlated with a higher nonunion rate (p = 0.002 and p = 0.012, respectively). Type of treatment (operative vs conservative) and displacement were not correlated with nonunion; however, stratification by both types of treatment and displacement revealed a difference in nonunion between the three fracture zones. Clinical significance: 5MT fracture nonunion remains a prevalent problem. The association between nonunion and weight, BMI, and fracture characteristics can be used by clinicians in the decision-making process regarding treatment and management of 5MT fractures to reduce the incidence of nonunion, improve patient-reported outcomes, and reduce the healthcare burden.

  1. Sarpong NO, Swindell HW, Trupia EP, et al. Metatarsal fractures. Foot Ankle Orthop 2018;3(3):247301141877509. DOI: 10.1177/2473011418775094
  2. Herterich V, Baumbach SF, Kaiser A, et al. Fifth metatarsal fracture. Dtsch Ärztebl Int 2021;118(35–36):587–594. DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0231
  3. Kane JM, Sandrowski K, Saffel H, et al. The epidemiology of fifth metatarsal fracture. Foot Ankle Spec 2015;8(5):354–359. DOI: 10.1177/1938640015569768
  4. Zwitser EW, Breederveld RS. Fractures of the fifth metatarsal; diagnosis and treatment. Injury 2010;41(6):555–562. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2009.05.035
  5. Ramponi DR. Proximal fifth metatarsal fractures. Adv Emerg Nurs J 2013;35(4):287–292. DOI: 10.1097/TME.0b013e3182aa057b
  6. Lawrence SJ, Botte MJ. Jones’ fractures and related fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal. Foot Ankle 1993;14(6):358–365. DOI: 10.1177/107110079301400610
  7. Glasgow MT, Naranja RJ Jr, Glasgow SG, et al. Analysis of failed surgical management of fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal distal to the tuberosity: the Jones fracture. Foot Ankle Int 1996;17(8):449–457. DOI: 10.1177/107110079601700803
  8. Granata JD, Berlet GC, Philbin TM, et al. Failed surgical management of acute proximal fifth metatarsal (Jones) fractures: a retrospective case series and literature review. Foot Ankle Spec 2015;8(6):454–459. DOI: 10.1177/1938640015592836
  9. Cheung CN, Lui TH. Proximal fifth metatarsal fractures: anatomy, classification, treatment and complications. Arch Trauma Res 2016;5(4):e33298. DOI: 10.5812/atr.33298
  10. Rikken QGH, Dahmen J, Hagemeijer NC, et al. Adequate union rates for the treatment of acute proximal fifth metatarsal fractures. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2021;29(4):1284–1293. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-020-06072-8
  11. Rosenberg GA, Sferra JJ. Treatment strategies for acute fractures and nonunions of the proximal fifth metatarsal. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2000;8(5):332–338. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200009000-00007
  12. Clapper MF, O’Brien TJ, Lyons PM. Fractures of the fifth metatarsal. Analysis of a fracture registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995;315:238–241. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199506000-00027
  13. Kavanaugh JH, Brower TD, Mann RV. The Jones fracture revisited. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1978;60(6):776–782. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-197860060-00008
  14. Petrisor BA, Ekrol I, Court-Brown C. The epidemiology of metatarsal fractures. Foot Ankle Int 2006;27(3):172–174. DOI: 10.1177/107110070602700303
  15. Bowes J, Buckley R. Fifth metatarsal fractures and current treatment. World J Orthop 2016;7(12):793–800. DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v7.i12.793
  16. Ruta DJ, Parker D. Jones fracture management in athletes. Orthop Clin North Am 2020;51(4):541–553. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2020.06.010
  17. Thorud JC, Mortensen S, Thorud JL, et al. Effect of obesity on bone healing after foot and ankle long bone fractures. J Foot Ankle Surg 2017;56(2):258–262. DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2016.11.010
  18. Larson CM, Almekinders LC, Taft TN, et al. Intramedullary screw fixation of Jones fractures. Analysis of failure. Am J Sports Med 2002;30(1):55–60. DOI: 10.1177/03635465020300012301
  19. Pettersen PM, Radojicic N, Grün W, et al. Proximal fifth metatarsal fractures: a retrospective study of 834 fractures with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Foot Ankle Int 2022;43(5):602–608. DOI: 10.1177/10711007211069123
  20. Solan M, Davies M. Nonunion of fifth metatarsal fractures. Foot Ankle Clin 2014;19(3):499–519. DOI: 10.1016/j.fcl.2014.06.009
  21. Jones RI. Fracture of the base of the fifth metatarsal bone by indirect violence. Ann Surg 1902;35(6):697–700.2.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.